Cursor costs $20. So why would anyone build an AI coding agent that costs $1,000,000? Try Blitzy for yourself here and get 1M lines of reverse engineering and 25k lines of code generation for free: http://blitzy.com/sandbox?utm_medium=paid_media&utm_source=influencer_tech_with_tim&utm_campaign=sandbox
In this video, I put Cursor and Blitzy head-to-head on the same coding problem. The interesting part isn’t just which tool writes more code. It’s how differently they approach the entire development workflow.
I’ll break down the coding models behind them, walk through both workflows, and compare the actual changes each one makes to the codebase. By the end, you’ll see why building an AI coding agent at this scale requires a very different approach.
Want to LEARN how to build useful AI agents that actually get things done? Go here: https://aiagentbuilders.co/yt
? Tools I Use
Get 10% off with code techwithtim
Openclaw setup: https://www.hostinger.com/techwithtim
VPS setup: https://www.hostinger.com/techwithtim10
Wispr Flow (Best AI Dictation): https://ref.wisprflow.ai/TechWithTim-aug26
⏳ Timestamps ⏳
00:00 | Overview |
00:36 | The Coding Model
02:31 | Introducing Blitzy
04:26 | The Issue We're Fixing
07:33 | Cursor Workflow
08:39 | Blitzy Workflow
12:35 | Comparing the Changes
Hashtags
#AI #Coding #Blitzy
UAE Media License Number: 3635141